Visit the Newson Gale web site

Emission control for metal coating plants

An Anguil Environmental Systems product story
Edited by the Processingtalk editorial team Dec 11, 2007

As the first generation of oxidiser systems in the industry nears the end of their service life, many canmaking plants face repair or replacement of their existing air pollution control systems

Like many others in the industry, a Silgan canmaking plant in the Midwest had been using a thermal recuperative oxidiser with direct heat recovery for control of emissions from its sheet coating lines.

After more than a decade of service, the oxidiser was reaching a point that repairs would be needed in order to continue to meet strict compliance limits so Silgan began looking for an effective, efficient solution.

Historically, thermal recuperative oxidisers with direct heat recovery have been a popular choice in canmaking facilities - especially those with oven zones operating above 350F (177C).

In the past, thermal recuperative oxidisers had a capital cost advantage over regenerative thermal oxidisers (RTOs) and boasted much more flexible Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) loading limitations.

Their one drawback has always been in supplemental fuel usage.

Thermal recuperative oxidisers top out at 70 percent internal heat recovery, whereas RTOs are able to achieve more than 95 percent.

For canmakers, this drawback was minimised with the use of additional heat recovery.

Hot, purified air from the oxidiser is routed directly back to the oven zones and not lost to the atmosphere.

This has reduced the operating cost 'penalty' of the thermal recuperative oxidiser and - in the past - has swung the balance toward specifying that system for VOC loads above ten percent Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) almost exclusively.

So exclusively, that, when hearing that Anguil Environmental Systems had recommended an RTO for its Midwest coating facility, Silgan responded almost incredulously: "They recommended what? This is clearly not an RTO application".

Given the technologies offered when Silgan made its initial selection of a thermal recuperative oxidiser, this was an understandable response.

It also served as an ideal framework to study what has changed in oxidiser design over the past decade to reverse such a drastic initial response:.

* Thermal recuperative oxidisers no longer have capital cost advantage.

* With hot gas bypass and feed forward technology, RTOs are now specified in situations up to 25 percent LEL.

* With fuel costs being unstable and still on the rise, every heat recovery percentage points counts.

* New requirements for VOC capture plus destruction have marginalised direct heat recovery and increased the operating cost gap between thermal recups and RTOs.

The existing Silgan thermal recuperative oxidiser was designed based on volume of airflow, organic vapour concentrations and desired destruction efficiency.

During operation, VOC-laden air is drawn into the system fan and is discharged into a heat exchanger.

The air is preheated through the tube side of the heat exchanger and then passes the burner, where the contaminated air is raised to the thermal oxidation temperature (1,200-1,800F / 650-1,000C).

When the VOC-laden air is raised to the thermal oxidation temperature for the specified residence time (0.5-2.0 seconds), an exothermic reaction takes place.

The VOCs in the air stream are converted to carbon dioxide and water vapour.

The hot, purified air then passes on the shell side of the heat exchanger where the energy released by the reaction is used to preheat the incoming solvent laden air reducing the system fuel consumption.

Finally, the contaminant-free air is exhausted into the atmosphere.

A weakness in all thermal recuperative oxidiser designs is that the steel in the heat exchanger is exposed to high burner chamber temperatures (typically up to 1600F / 871C).

The system at Silgan had a history of requiring on-going maintanance in this area, which had been driving up cost and impacting throughput.

The engineering team at Silgan needed to fix the aging system, replace it with an equivalent, or look for alternative equipment.

After evaluating several options, the RTO selection was based on the capital cost advantage and operating cost savings.

It would be a custom-built abatement system designed specifically for this application with high loadings and concentrations.

Anguil would design, manufacture and install a 40,000 scfm RTO with heat recovery, hot gas bypass and oven purge system.

The new Silgan RTO operates as follows.

The solvent laden process gas enters the oxidiser through an inlet manifold.

Flow control, poppet valves direct this gas into one of two energy recovery chambers where the process gas is preheated.

The process gas and contaminants are progressively heated in the inlet ceramic bed as they move toward the combustion chamber.

The VOCs are oxidised in the combustion chamber, releasing thermal energy in the ceramic bed that is in the outlet flow direction from the combustion chamber.

The outlet ceramic bed is heated and the gas is cooled so that the outlet gas temperature is only slightly higher than the process inlet temperature.

Flow control, poppet valves routinely alternate the airflow direction into the ceramic beds to maximise energy recovery within the oxidiser.

The VOC oxidation and high energy recovery within these oxidisers reduces the auxiliary fuel requirement and saves operating cost.

For example, at 95 percent thermal energy recovery, the outlet temperature may be only 70F (40C) higher than the inlet process gas temperature with an RTO.

The oxidiser can reach self-sustaining operation with no auxiliary fuel usage at typical operating concentrations.

The process emissions at the Silgan facility as well as the temperature of the oven zones presented some challenges, as well as opportunities.

With process LEL levels as high as 14 percent there was a concern over high temperature in the RTO.

A hot side bypass valve was provided to allow excess RTO reaction chamber heat to be vented directly into the exhaust or back to the oven inlet manifold during periods when the inlet VOC loading provides more heat than is necessary to maintain the set point temperature.

This primary heat recovery saves thousands of dollars in operating costs because the ovens require much less fuel to reach the desired temperature.

With the Anguil design there is no loss of residence time at temperature, ensuring destruction and eliminating the concern of overheating the unit.

VOC destruction efficiency is guaranteed whether the bypass is open or not.

Silgan is also investigating another energy reduction strategy by using a secondary heat exchanger to recover additional heat from the RTO exhaust stack..

Initial estimates show that an extra 6.5 million btu/hr can be recovered by utilising a heat exchanger in the oxidiser stack.

Fresh air (at an average outdoor temperature of 46F / 8C) passes through a single pass 50% effective heat exchanger and is heated up to approximately 350F (177C).

This recovered heat can be used for processes or comfort heat during the winter months, which could translate into significant savings.

The RTO is also equipped with a high temperature bake-out system, very similar to the self-cleaning option in an oven.

This feature removes organic build-up on the cold face of the heat exchange media.

In the bake-out mode, the RTO is taken off-line from the process.

At a reduced airflow, the outlet temperature is allowed to reach an elevated temperature before the flow direction is switched.

This hot air vaporizes organic particulate, essentially clearing the media bed of any obstruction.

The flow direction is then switched and the opposite cold face is cleaned.

Standard bake-out occurs at 650F (343C), stainless steel media supports and poppet valves were used on the Silgan system that allowed bake-out temperatures to reach 800F (427C), ensuring a more complete cleaning.

Scheduled RTO bake-outs reduce the pressure drop across the heat recovery beds.

Therefore, Anguil included the transmitters necessary to monitor media bed pressure drop and provide both continuous recording of this data as well as an indication to the operators when a bake-out is recommended.

Dan Gallo, Silgan area manager of manufacturing, was pleased with the outcome.

"We selected Anguil because of its technical excellence and commitment to service," he said.

"Not only has the company been able to troubleshoot its own equipment, but Anguil has also provided operating solutions for oxidisers made by other manufacturers.

We are pleased with their dedication to excellence and are happy to have Anguil as a business partner".

Not what you're looking for? Search the site.

Back to top Back to top

Contact Anguil Environmental Systems

Related Stories

Contact Anguil Environmental Systems

 

Newsletter sign up

Request your free weekly copy of the Processingtalk email newsletter ...

Visit the Newson Gale web site

Search by company

A Pro-talk Publication

A Pro-talk publication