Product category:
Personnel: Safety, Hygiene + Development
News Release from: Chartered Management Institute | Subject: Quality of Working Life
Edited by the Processingtalk Editorial
Team on 13 December 2007
What hinders worker productivity in
engineering?
Figures just published show that performance levels in workplaces across the engineering sector are suffering, as overbearing and dogmatic management practices top the list of management styles
The 'Quality of Working Life' report, which questioned 1,511 managers, describes a 'Command and control' approach to work that hinders productivity in engineering sector, and also found a high rate of sickness and absence levels in organisations exhibiting 'negative' management styles The report, published by the Chartered Management Institute and Simplyhealth, assessed the impact of differing managerial styles on motivation, health and productivity
This article was originally published on Processingtalk on 5 Dec 2007 at 8.00am (UK)
Related stories
Will training via the internet ever take off?
Senior managers across the engineering sector are missing easy opportunities to hone their skills, as they fail to make use of the online resources available to them
'Work while you're sick' attitude in engineering
Ill-health, combined with a culture where 'illness equals weakness', is reported to be hitting organisations across the engineering sector, resulting in declining performance and waning enthusiasm
Key findings include:.
Tight reins: the most widely experienced management styles in the engineering sector are reactive (35 per cent), bureaucratic (26 per cent) and authoritarian (25 per cent).
Worryingly, all three have become increasingly common; the top two have increased by 6 per cent since 2004, with authoritarian leadership also rising 5 per cent.
Further reading
Females resign despite rapid promotion and bonuses
Female resignations hit a new high in the engineering sector despite generally receiving rapid promotions and better bonus pay-outs than men: women are nearly twice as likely to receive a bonus
Engineering career ambition stifled by bureaucracy
Managers in the engineering sector are extremely ambitious, but believe their careers are being held back by organisational red tape and a lack of support from their employers
Climate change ignored by execs in engineering
Calls to cut the UK 'carbon footprint' are being ignored by managers in the engineering sector as they plan their annual summer getaway
Index linked: the research shows empowering managerial styles are most associated with growing businesses.
More than 1 in 3 (37 per cent) of organisations performing well are cited as having 'accessible' management teams, whereas 56 per cent of declining companies exhibit bureaucracy and 25 per cent create a 'secretive' environment.
Sicknote culture: only 1 in 10 respondents said absence increased in organisations with 'innovative' and 'trusting' cultures.
This was in contrast to 45 per cent suggesting sickness rates have gone up where employers were 'suspicious'.
Jo Causon, director, marketing and corporate affairs, at the Chartered Management Institute, says: "The effect of management styles on performance can be marked and has a direct bearing on the levels of health, motivation and commitment linking employers and staff.
Of course, improving the sense of wellbeing, determination and productivity, is no easy task but one that cannot be ignored.
Left alone, it will only serve to reduce morale and lower the quality of working life".
The findings show that the majority in the engineering sector (74 per cent) are motivated by 'a sense of achievement from reaching organisational goals'.
However, it is clear from the research that management style also has a dramatic impact on job satisfaction.
For example, the presence of an authoritarian approach depresses enjoyment of work by 27 points, from 71 to 44 per cent.
Confidence in senior management teams also declines from 60 to 27 per cent, where the dominant style is bureaucratic.
Des Benjamin, chief executive of Simplyhealth, says: "There is increasing pressure to improve competitiveness and efficiency, but this doesn't have to be about reducing costs.
At Simplyhealth we have focused on creating the right environment and the right management behaviours.
The result, compared to other organisations surveyed, is that our prevalent management styles are ranked as accessible, empowering and trusting and we've been able to cope with more change, with less detrimental effect on our health.
Hence you can improve competitiveness and enhance performance by creating a healthy environment rather than reacting to an unhealthy one".
The report was developed by Professor Les Worrall (University of Wolverhampton Business School) and Professor Cary Cooper (Lancaster University Business School).
It is the sixth in a series of reports exploring the quality of working life in the UK.
Commenting on the findings, Professor Cooper says: "Against a backdrop of constant change, the relationship between good management practice and the reality of the workplace is intriguing.
In an environment dominated by the need to retain the best talent, it is also extremely disappointing to see negative styles prevail in the UK".
• Chartered Management Institute: contact details and other news
• Email this article to a colleague
• Register for the free Processingtalk email newsletter
• Processingtalk Home Page
