Product category:
Air handling: Dust + Fume extraction
News Release from: Kirk & Blum Duct | Subject: Energy costs for ventilation
Edited by the Processingtalk Editorial
Team on 18 September 2007
There's gold in the air power equation
You can reduce energy costs for ventilation and emission control systems with careful attention to just four factors, says Gerry Lanham, PE, President of KBD
The mathematics for properly designing ventilation and emission control systems have been around for quite awhile, but our studies of hundreds of systems show that many are wasting energy, while still lacking capacity to meet applicable codes and process objectives There's a lot of money on the table in operating costs for these systems
This article was originally published on Processingtalk on 12 Feb 2007 at 8.00am (UK)
Related stories
CAD design service for duct installations
Free CAD design service offered with line of clamp-together adjustable length ducting suitable for mists, fumes, trim scrap and dusts, in a wide range of materials, gauges and sizes, with accessories
Aluminum recycling furnace dust collection system
An aluminum can recycling plant turned to Ceco Environmental for a new furnace dust collector system using Kirk and Blum ducts, producing a 5-10% productivity improvement and cleaner plant air
More than 40% of the energy consumed in most manufacturing plants is used to power fans, pumps and ventilators.
In some cases, the annual operating costs of a system may actually exceed the initial capital cost within two years of installation.
Opportunities for improvement reside in the air power equation.
Further reading
Dust extraction and air recirculation saves money
With help from Kirk and Blum Duct, a maker of plastic colour concentrates extracts and cleans dust-laden air, and recirculates the filtered air, reducing AC load and summer electric bills by half
New book explains motor and drive technology
New book from ISA demystifies motor and drive technology used in today's modern manufacturing processes
Record breaking electric car to go the distance
ABB has found a novel way to put its drives and motors to the ultimate test by providing the main drive system for the British challenger to to the world electric land speed record
Power required for an air handling system is computed with the following factors:.
1) Volumetric Flow Rate "Q", stated in ft3/min (cubic feet per minute).
2) Total Pressure (resistance due to friction in ducts, hoods and deltaP of control device, etc.) "TP" stated in inches of water.
3) Density factor of the gas being collected "df" (dimensionless).
4) Efficiency of the fan, "Eff" (dimensionless).
These are combined into the Air Power Equation:.
Power (horsepower) = (Q)(TP)(df) (Eff)(6356).
Fan efficiency is stated as a percent of 100, so a fan operating at 65% efficiency would have a value of 0.65 in the equation.
Similarly, df (density factor) is defined as the density of the gas compared to Standard Air (defined as moistureless air at sea level and 70F), so density units divided by density units cancel and the number has no dimension.
Air at 600F has a density of 0.0375 pounds per cubic foot.
Air at standard conditions has a density of 0.075 pounds per cubic foot.
So the density factor for 600F air is (0.0375 / 0.075 = ) 0.50.
Small reductions in the numerator can have a significant cost impact.
For example, a typical 20,000 CFM baghouse requires 60 or more horsepower for operation.
A reduction of 1000 CFM with improved hood design, or reduction of 1 inch static pressure with an improved duct or baghouse system, can save as much as USD4000 per year.
There are always limits on what can be done, however.
The process may require a certain airflow or hooding arrangement, and that will dictate air volume.
Adjustments to system pressure and fan efficiency may be better places to effect reductions.
System pressure is usually affected by two factors:.
1) Hood and duct resistance as a function of velocities in the system and the inefficiencies of flow (poorly designed hoods, short radius elbows, branch entry angles greater than 45degrees, abrupt contractions, and elbows and other interferences at fan inlets and outlets - called Fan System Effects, etc).
2) Resistance across the emission control device.
A baghouse that operates at a pressure drop of 8 inches H2O will require twice the power of a collector operating at 4 inches H20.
However, the lower pressure drop collector may not provide the capture efficiency of the baghouse with higher pressure drop.
Of course you can lower the pressure drop in a baghouse by adding filter area, but this means a larger housing.
More important, baghouses often perform best at high pressure drops.
The key is to minimise pressure drop while still meeting emission requirements.
Excess static pressure just wastes power.
Here are some tips to help find that narrow range of safe and efficient operation.
1) Minimise.
Flow systems directly connected to a process source are inherently volume-limited, whereas systems that capture emissions with enclosures or hoods need to be optimised during the design process.
Total enclosure of an emission source minimises air flow and worker exposure.
However, such enclosures can restrict visual observation of the process and hinder maintenance access.
Hoods that cannot be designed for total enclosure should be located as close to the source as possible.
A side draft hood located twice the distance from the source can require as much as four times the exhaust volumetric flow rate as a total enclosure.
Capture hoods for high-velocity emissions (from grinding, sawing, etc) must be located so the opening is in the direct path of the dust, fume or mist.
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists publication Industrial Ventilation - A Manual of Recommended Practice provides guidelines for good design of hoods, duct and similar equipment.
Other factors such as explosive limits for the gas being collected, moisture content (dew point) and heat content may influence the air volumetric flow rate requirements so there may be limits to the optimisation.
2) Minimise Pressure.
Pressure offers greater opportunities to reduce energy costs.
A system with good airflow characteristics (duct velocities and sizes optimised), matched with the proper control device, pressure monitors and variable frequency drives, can help manage system pressure.
Most bag houses or other collection devices will have varying pressure drops over the life of the system.
Bags are generally more efficient at higher pressure drop, but then use more energy.
Scrubbers, oxidisers and electrostatic precipitators tend to operate at more constant resistance.
A good pressure monitoring system that controls system volumetric flow rate can save thousands of dollars every year on the operation of even medium sized systems.
As variable frequency drives become less expensive they are now being found on many installations, especially systems of over 10,000 CFM.
Be mindful of duct inefficiencies and Fan System Effects (elbows at inlets and outlets, etc.).
These shortcuts increase static pressure and operating costs for the life of the system.
3) Control Density.
Temperature, moisture, molecular weight, elevation and the absolute pressure in the duct or vessel affect the density of the transporting gas.
A density change may affect the hardware requirements for the system.
Evaporative cooling, for example, reduces volume, but the higher density air requires more power.
This may be more than offset by reduced costs for smaller ducts, control devices and fans (as well as lower the value for volumetric flow rate in the equation).
Cooler temperatures may also allow use of less expensive collectors, fans and peripheral devices.
4) Fan Efficiency.
The design of the fan and its blade type can greatly affect efficiency and power requirements.
Laboratory-measured peak fan efficiency may not be the most stable point of operation.
If peak efficiency coincides with the peak of the pressure curve then there may be operational problems as volumetric flow rates vary with small changes in system pressure.
The designer must consider both curves when selecting the best fan and operating point to optimise reliability and power usage.
And fan type may dictate proper selection.
Airfoil wheels, while more efficient, may not be a good choice when handling particulate-laden air.
The key to any design is proper fan selection.
Summary.
The power equation identifies four main areas - volumetric flow rate, pressure, density and fan efficiency - that affect energy consumption.
The challenge for industry is to operate in the narrow functional range that guarantees system effectiveness with minimum energy consumption.
Attention to the Air Power Equation can help meet those goals.
Before thinking about the air power equation, here are some good design goals for any team studying new projects or system alterations.
1) Protect worker and public health by meeting local/national standards for in-plant air and exhaust.
2) Provide an efficient connection to the process through proper hood design or direct connection to the process, while considering safety for fire, explosion and process reactions, as well as the ergonomics of process access.
3) Minimise auxiliary costs (compressed air, natural gas, water, etc).
4) Minimise replacement costs (filter bags, neutralising chemicals, etc).
5) Provide an easily maintained and accessible system.
6) Make the system simple to operate and train personnel to ensure on-going performance.
7) Look for opportunities to recycle tempered air back to the plant or process by filtering exhaust through redundant systems.
• Kirk & Blum Duct: contact details and other news
• Email this article to a colleague
• Register for the free Processingtalk email newsletter
• Processingtalk Home Page
Search the Pro-Talk network of sites
